Demand for lions’ bones a poisonous affair

THE ongoing Asian demand for lion bones has led to an horrific wildlife poisoning in the Limpopo National Park, just over the Mozambican border from Kruger Park.

A mere 2km from the Machampane tourist I camp, a research team came across the carcasses of two nyala, a warthog and an impala laced with what they describe as a black granular poison.

Lying nearby were two lions, 51 vultures, I three fish eagles, a yellowbilled kite and a giant eagle owl. There was evidence of a leopard but its body was not found.

The lions had been dismembered, their bones removed and 22 vultures had been I decapitated, their heads presumably to be used for muti. Snares had also been set around the poisoned carcasses.

The team from the Limpopo Transfrontier Predator Project burned all the poisoned carcasses. At the recent Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites), wild lions remained listed as Appendix 11 with a “zero annual export quota for bones, bone I pieces, products, claws, skeletons, skulls and teeth removed from the wild and traded for commercial purposes”.

However, in a shock move, captive breeders escaped the ban, with South Africa only required to submit an annual quota for bone exports from captive breeding facilities.

Will Travers, president of the Born Free Foundation, called it an appalling decision which would perpetuate captive breeding bone trade. He called it a sad day for Cites. Conservationists have pointed out that it’s impossible to distinguish between the bones of captive or wild lions, leaving the door wide open for laundering of poached animal parts.

Nine African nations, Niger, Chad, Cote d’Ivoire, Gabon, Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Nigeria and Togo, sought to uplist lions to Appendix I, offering full trade protection However, in a.compromise move, Cites allowed the marketing of captive lion bones.

According to the filmmakers of Blood Lions, this was “an attempt to appease fierce opposition from lion bone and body part traders and hunting for entertainment enthusiasts”.

The Limpopo research team found the two lions had been carried 200 metres away from the epicentre of the poisoning onto a nearby ridge and butchered.

The skins, a portion of abdomens with significant layer of fat and intestines, were left.

The two male lions were both estimated to be about two years old. All their bones had been removed and meat had been cut into strips, dried and mostly removed.

This is the second poisoning event that has targeted the lion pride in this same area. The first one, in July 2014, killed three adult lions, seven whitebacked vultures and a bateleur eagle. According to the team, “this poisoning is the first time that we have found evidence of lions being targeted for their bones in the park. Considering the prevalence of.commercial rhino and elephant poaching in the region over the past five years we are concerned that this event could mark the beginning of largescale poaching of lions for their bones in the Limpopo National Park”.

The Blue Fund celebrates World African Penguin awareness day and pledges support to SANCCOB’s African Penguin Chick Bolstering Project

The African Penguin population is in a critical decline, with approximately 2.5% of the numbers recorded in the 1930’s remaining today. This iconic species is endemic to the coastal region of Southern Africa and is a key indicator of the health of our oceans and fish stocks.

There are a number of threats facing the population with one of the most significant being the abandonment of chicks that hatch late in the season. Adults abandon their young when they start their annual moult and replace their worn-out feathers with a new set of waterproof feathers. During this 3-4 week moulting process, they are unable to hunt for fish or feed their young. As a result, the chicks that have yet to fledge are abandoned.  The mass abandonment of chicks has been a recorded phenomenon since the 1930s and is influenced by factors such as fish availability, climate change and health-related issues amongst adult penguins.

Wildlands and Grindrod Bank (through their CSI initiative, the Blue Fund) have partnered with SANCCOB to assist their efforts to mitigate the effects of chick abandonment and rescue the 300 – 400 penguin chicks that are expected to be abandoned during ‘chick season’. Once the chicks have been rehabilitated and grown their juvenile plumage, they will be released back into the wild.

“SANCCOB and their partners in the sector, have established the African Penguin Chick Bolstering Project. This project is recognised globally as one of the most successful conservation initiatives to reverse the decline of the endangered species”, explained SANCCOB’s Fundraising and Marketing manager, Francois Louw.

“Independent research has confirmed that the wild African penguin population is 19% higher directly due to SANCCOB’s conservation efforts, with the organisation having successfully released more than 4000 chicks back into the wild since the project’s inception in 2006”, said Louw.

With the nesting season taking place from November to January, SANCCOB and the Blue Fund will be running an “Adopt a Chick” campaign during that same period. The campaign aims to raise sufficient funds to cover the operational costs associated with the chick bolstering project and other rescue and rehabilitation activities. In addition, the campaign hopes to raise awareness about the plight of this iconic bird and the health of our oceans.

How to Get Involved
The ‘Adopt a Chick’ campaign encourages individuals to adopt an abandoned African penguin at a cost of R600. “By adopting a chick, you will be allowed to name it and receive an adoption pack via email which includes a certificate of adoption and a photograph of the chick,” said Mark Gerrard, Wildlands’ Strategic Manager: Community Conservation. “In order to support this crucial initiative, the Blue Fund will match any contributions made by the public to the ‘Adopt a Chick’ campaign, effectively doubling the funds received and doubling SANCCOB’s vital conservation efforts,” Gerrard concluded.

Thank you to Grindrod Bank for their unwavering support for marine conservation and without their support, initiatives such as these would not be possible.

#ShockWildlifeTruths: Mass poisoning in Limpopo National Park

Johannesburg –  The ongoing Asian demand for lion bones has led to an horrific wildlife poisoning in the Limpopo National Park, just over the Mozambican border from Kruger Park.

A mere two kilometres from the Machampane tourist camp, a research team came across the carcases of two nyala, a warthog and an impala laced with what they describe as a black granular poison. Lying nearby were two lions, 51 vultures, three fish eagles, a yellow-billed kite and a giant eagle owl. There was evidence of a leopard but its body was not found.

The lions had been dismembered, their bones removed, and 22 vultures had been decapitated, their heads presumably to be used for muti. Snares had also been set around the poisoned carcases. The team from the Limpopo Transfrontier Predator Project burned all the poisoned carcasses.

At the recent Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), wild lions remained listed as Appendix 11 with a ‘zero annual export quota for bones, bone pieces, products, claws, skeletons, skulls and teeth removed from the wild and traded for commercial purposes.’ However, in a shock move, captive breeders escaped the ban, with South Africa only required to submit an annual quota for bone exports from captive breeding facilities.

Will Travers, President of the Born Free Foundation, called it an appalling decision which would perpetuate captive breeding bone trade. He called a sad day for CITES. Conservationists have pointed out that it’s impossible to distinguish between the bones of captive or wild lions, leaving the door wide open for laundering of poached animal parts.

Nine African nations – Niger, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Gabon, Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Nigeria and Togo – sought to uplist lions to Appendix I, offering full trade protection However, in a compromise move, CITES allowed the marketing of captive lion bones. According to the filmmakers of Blood Lions, this was ‘an attempt to appease the fierce opposition from lion bone and body part traders and the hunting for entertainment enthusiasts’

The Limpopo research team found the two lions had been carried 200 metres away from the epicenter of the poisoning onto a nearby ridge and butchered. The skins, a portion of the abdomens with significant layer of fat and the intestines were left.

The two male lions were both estimated to be about two years old. All their bones had been removed and meat had been cut into strips, dried and mostly removed.

This is the second poisoning event that has targeted the lion pride in this same area. The first one, in July 2014, killed three adult lions, seven white-backed vultures and a bateleur eagle. According to the team, “this poisoning is the first time that we have found evidence of lions being targeted for their bones in the park. Considering the prevalence of commercial rhino and elephant poaching in the region over the past five years we are concerned that this event could mark the beginning of large-scale poaching of lions for their bones in the Limpopo National Park”.

Moetiemark in Jhb skok Cites groep

Erg bedreigde diere se liggaamsdele te koop

Die ietermagogskubbe en die die velle, bene en tande van leeus en luiperds wat op ‘n mark in die Johannesburgse middestad verkoop word, het ‘n groep afgevaardigdes na die COP17-beraadna hul asem laat snak.

Die groep het videomateriaal en dit aan Ian Mi chler, een van vervaardigers van Blood lions, gegee.

Michler se die mense was uiters geskok om die liggaamsdele te sien van de bedreigde en kritiek bedreigde diere waaroor daar in die konferensielokale in Sandton gepraat word.

“Hier, minder as 15 km van die konferensiesentrum, sien hulle die karkasse van die einste diere wat nie verhandel mag word nie.

“Kan jy dink hoe geskok hulle was?”

In die video, wat sowat vyf minute lank is, kan die skedel van ‘n hiena en die karkasse van aasvoels gesien word.

Die mense wat die video geneem het, wil glo anoniem bly. Michler het dit op die nie-regeringsorgansasie Blood Lions se Facebookblad geplaas.

Op die video kan gehoor en gesien word hoe mense na hul asem snak toe hulle na die karkasse van die ietermagogs, leeus en luiperds kyk.

Dit is veral die Faraday Muthi-mark in die middestad wat hul oe laat rek het.

Die ietermagog is verlede wwek in bylae 1 van die konvensie oor die internasionale handel in bedreigde spesies aangeteken. Die beteken daar is nou ‘n verbod op alle handel in die dier of liggaamsdele van die dier.

Geen luiperds mag op die oomblik in SuidAfrika gejag word nie omdat niemand weet hoeveel van hulle nog oor is nie.

Leeus het in bylae 2 ook ‘n mate van berskermde status en mag nie sonder ‘n permit gejag word nie. As iemand ‘n leeu wil verkoop, moet hy ‘n permit daarvoor he.

 permitte nie.

Andrew Mbhalati van die Gautengse departement van landbou en landelike ontwikkeling se hy is nie seker of ampte ters van die afdeling vir biodiversiteit al op die Faraday Muthi-mark oegeslaan het nie.

Hy se die wetstoepasser wat verantwoordelik is, is tans met verlof. Sy lynbestuurder, by wie hy antwoorde moet kry, is met siekteverlof.

Hy se sy kollegas behoort Maandag weer op kantoor te inligting oor die mark kry.

Michler se dit is ironies dat SuidAfrika oenskynlik (veral in Gauteng)  nie genoeg wetstoepassers het nie, terwyl die departement van omgewingsake R132 miljoen daaraan bestee het om die Citeskonferensie in Johannesburg aan te bied.

As die departement regtig ernstig is oor die bewaring van die land se bedreigde wild, sou hy daardie geld gebruik het om nog wetstoepassers aan te stel, se hy.

Blood Lions gaan die saak beslis nie net daar laat nie. “Ons gaan na nog markte in die stad en oor die land heen soek en foto’s neem.”

Wildboere brul van plesier oor leeubene

Omgewingsaktiviste brul van woede en wildboere brul van plesier oor die afgelope week se besluit wat die uitvoer van leeubene toelaat.

Die konvensie oor die internasionale handel in bedreigde spesies (Cites) het Maandag op die COP17beraad in Sandton besluit om die uitvoer van leeubene goed te keur.

Boere kan so tot R35 000 per leeukarkas verdien.

“Daar is nou ongelooflike valuta op pad na ons leeuboere,” se Carla van der Vyver, uitvoerende hoof van die SuidAfrikaanse Roofdiertelersvereniging.

“Ek ondersteun dit, want dit gaan maak dat daar nou meer leeus in SuidAfrika gaan wees.”

Na verwagting sal private wildplase hul leeubevolkings drasties aanvul sodat buitelandse jagters hul leeus vir uitvoer kan kom skiet.

Volgens die departement van omgewingsake se bestuursplan vir biodiversiteit onder leeus is daar tans sowat 3 400 leeus in reservate en meer as 6 000 “ge blikte” leeus op sowat 200 plase.

Christo Gomes (52), ‘n wildhoer van BelaBela, het sowat 200 leeus wat hy gaan vermeerder aangesien hy die dooies se bene kan verkoop.

“Die hoofdoel is om die waarde van die dier te beskerm. Hoe meer waarde jy aan horn heg, hoe meer diere kan jy aanhou en teel. Ons gebruik alles wat ‘n leeu ons bied en si5 gaan daar aan die einde van die dag meer van die spesie beskikbaar wees,” se Gomes.

Die VSA het in Desember ‘n verbod geplaas op opgestopte leeutrofee wat jagters na ‘n skietvakansie hier kan terugneem.

“Ek weet van vier wildplase wat elk meer as 50 mense moes afdank omdat hul leeus nie meer in aanvraag was nie,” se Van der Vyver. “Gewoonlik gee boere die reste van ‘n jag weg, en veral sangomas vind baat daarby.”

‘n Splinternuwe probleem het sO opgeduik: moetiemoorde op “geblikte” leeus.

“Nou word leeus links en regs vergiftig en onthoof, want daar word nie meer vir die moetiemark voorsien nie,” se Van der Vyver.

Volgens Gomes ly reservate nie hieronder nie. “Stropers weet nie waar leeus snags in die wildtuin rondkruip nie,” se hy. “SO ‘n leeu sal jou opvreet nog voordat jy vir horn gifvleis kan voer. By private kampe, soos my plek, gooi hulle die gif maar net oor die draad.”

Gomes het in Mei sy beste teel mannetjie, ter waarde van sowat R300 000, so verloor.

Sedert Desember is 30 leeus al deur moetiestropers landwyd doodgemaak.

Ian Michler, ‘n vervaardiger van die dokumentere fliek Blood Lions, het die week die fliek aan COP17beraadgangers gewys sodat mense “weer kan dink” oor die besluit oor leeubene.

In die fliek wys Michler plase uit waar leeus nie vrylik genoeg kan rondbeweeg nie en op kort afstand doodgeskiet word.

Van sy grootste kritiek is wildboere wat hul leeus “inteel”: “Oosterlinge verkies die smaak van wilde leeus se bene en daarom sal `geblikte’ leeus nie goed genoeg daar verkoop nie.”

Gomes se die bewerings is “alles nonsens”.

“As jy nie genoeg ruimte het nie, mag jy volgens wet nie leeus aanhou nie,” se hy.

“Jy moet te voet jag (wat kortafstandskote uitkanselleer). jy mag glad nie eens van ‘n bakkie af skiet nie, tensy jy gestremd is.

“Ons sal ook nooit ingeteelde leeus kan aanhou nie. Onthou, ons skiet vir trofee hien Dit beteken ons soek groter leeus met mooier hare, groter skedels en groter struktuur. Ons voer selfs leeus van die buiteland af in om die genepoel te vergroot.”

Hy lag kliphard oor die “smaak” van wilde leeus se bene.

“Dit is so goed jy probeer vir my vertel ‘n SuidAfrikaner het nie dieselfde soort bene in sy lyf as ‘n Amerikaner nie,” se Gomes.

Chris Mercer, direkteur van Campaign against Canned Hunting (Cach) se daar is een ding waarby ‘n mens nie verby kan kyk nie: “Hierdie is nog steeds maar net ‘n sakemodel wat geskoei is op ‘n roetine van wreedheid.”

Koning van oerwoud nou ‘n ‘sak waardelose bene’

Die koning van die oerwoud is Sondagaand op die COP17beraad in Sandton tot ‘n “sak waardelose bene” gereduseer.

So het die nieregeringsorganisasie Blood Lions Official gisteroggend getwiet oor die konven sie oor die internasionale handel in bedreigde spesies (Cites) se besluit dat die liggaamsdele van SuidAfrika se geblikte leeus uitgevoer mag word.

Cites het wel bepaal dat die beendere, tande en pote van wilde leeus wat aan natuurlike oorsake dood is nie na Asie uitge voer mag word nie.

Maar hy is nie gekant daarteen dat die liggaamsdele van die sowat 8 000 geblikte leeus wat in klein kampies in SuidAfrika geteel word, gebruik word nie.

Dit was ondanks die Wereldbewaringsunie (IUCN) se beroep op SuidAfrika om die geblikteleeubedryf te staak.

Karen Trendler van Four Paws se dit is ‘n tragedie.

“Dit is ‘n ontnugterende besef dat Cites ‘n handelsorganisasie is en dit [COP171 ‘n spel is wat om politieke getalle wentel.”

Edna Molewa, minister van omgewingsake, het die IUCN se beraad bygewoon wat in September in Hawaii gehou is.

People Against Canned Hunting (Pach) het getwiet: “Dankie, Cites. Panthera leo sal teen 2030 uitsterf.”

Leeus word intensief op nagenoeg 200 SuidAfrikaanse plase, Koning van oerwoud nou ‘n ‘sal( waardelose bene’ Elize Tempelhoff veral in die Vrystaat, Noordwes en Limpopo, geteel.

Molewa se dit is nie onwettig om wild in SuidAfrika te teel nie. Sy beskou dit as “volhoubare benutting”. Sy se die welsyn van die leeus in gevangenskap bekommer haar tog en haar departement ondersoek dit.

EXCLUSIVE: WATCH: Joburg market sells illegal wildlife products just down the road from CITES CoP17

Cape Town – This 5-minute raw footage taken at the Faraday Muthi market, in Selby, Johannesburg shows skins and animal parts of endangered species from cheetah, leopard, lion, chimp hands, hyena, pangolin, vulture.

This while just down the road in Sandton, more than 3 500 delegates from 183 member state countries attended the 17th Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora kicks  – one of the most important wildlife conferences focused on the protection and monitoring of trade in wildlife.

Yet at this Joburg market, a rather well-known muthi market in fact, the video clearly shows rampant trade in illegal wildlife products, most of which have very specific restrictions attached to trade, if any is even allowed.

The person who took the video and shared it with Blood Lions wishes to remain anonymous, but confirmed the video’s authenticity to Traveller24 and that it was taken in this week, saying it was “alarming to see so many leopard skins available”.

In January this year the Department of Environmental Affairs set provincial leopard trophy hunting quotas at zero for 2016, effectively banning leopard trophy hunting throughout South Africa for a year.

This calls into question the origin of these products, which include Pangolin skin, just moved up to CITES Appendix I as critically endangered. Other illegal products include lion skins and bone as well as endangered vulture species.

Traveller24 spoke to Green Scorpions Environmental Management Inspector for Complaints Andrew Mbhalati who is acting head for Green Scorpions head Lawrence Badenhorst at the moment, but he could not confirm if the market was being investigated.

Mbhalati says he would only be able to follow-up on the matter on Monday, when the necessary official Eric Mbela who deals with Biodiversity issues was back in the office.

‘We rely on the public to lodge a complaint’ 

Mbhalati says, “We rely on the public to lodge a complaint, where after the issues are then registered and we send the inspectors to investigate further.” He could not confirm that the division actively investigates or patrols well-known markets such as Faraday.

But given that the film was shot in this week, it does not appear as if this particular one is being actively monitored.

Ian Michler, the investigative conservationist behind the documentary Blood Lions who has seen the video told Traveller24 that while no official complaint has been laid, Blood Lions would definitely be collecting a full body of information in order to do so.

Michler says, “The striking irony of this is that a mere 15km from where the world has been holding the most important conference on the trade of endangered species is that these products are being traded in a market.

“The video shows everything from lion and vultures and crocodiles and primate hands.”

‘Greatest irony and sadness in actual fact’ 

Michler says that while it is all good and well for the stakeholders to hold intellectual discussions on the endangered species, it highlights how little is actually being done on the ground and exactly why these species are in trouble.

“It is one thing to accord them protection in writing but it is another to enforce those laws entirely which CITES needs to be aware of,” says Michler.

“It is the greatest irony and sadness in actual fact,” says Michler.

When told that the Green Scorpions rely largely on investigating complaints made by the public or organisations who witness the illegal trader Michler says, “This is an indictment on local and national government, the fact that a country of South Africa’s stature when it comes to wildlife cannot get a rudimentary protection force together to carry out their mandate.”

Michler says, “At least give them the capabilities to patrol markets in the heart of the city – because this is what it boils down to, we are not talking about markets that are in the middle of nowhere. These are visible to everyone. It is extremely sad and a very concerning situation – that they don’t have the resources to carry out the most basic regulatory mandate.”

Michler says Blood Lions would be looking at other areas in the CBD as well as try to ascertain who the suppliers to these markets area as part of its official complaint.

NSPCA Wildlife aware of the muthi market

National Council of SPCA spokesperson Isobel Wentzel told Traveller24 that while they are aware of the market it falls out of their domain.

“We don’t have proof on how the animals are killed, it would be about the manner in how they were killed or proof of cruelty. The fact is we don’t know if they were alive when the parts were chopped off.”

However Wentzel says, “Market traders need to be in possession of a wildlife trader permit, which must be regulated as it is issued subject to specific quotas. They need permits even if it’s for traditional medicine.”

Wentzel agreed that all known muthi market across the various provinces need to be checked on, especially to establish proof of origin.

CITES regulates international and not domestic trade

“Conservation enforcement departments have to check if these guys have been issued permits. But its clear some of the species they can’t get permits to trade in”, which is the key issue here according to Wentzel.

While CITES regulates international and not domestic trade, Wentzel says these traders are still accountable as it is illegal to take animals such as pangolin out of the wild, let alone sell them.

“You cannot take animals out of the wild; it must be legally bred in captivity in order to trade some of them.”

Wentzel also suggests that it is unlikely these parts came from animals that died of natural causes.

“If animals die of natural causes a permit needs to be obtained just to keep the horn of rhino for example. Leopard or cheetah skins cannot leave that property unless they have a registered wildlife permit. Curios all have permits for their wildlife items.

“Even if they call it traditional medicine or muthi markets they are not exempted from the law.”

‘Verligting’ oor geblikte leeus

Die geblikte leeubedryf in SuidAfrika mag voortgaan.

Edna Molewa, minister van omgewingsake, het Dinsdagmiddag op die laaste mediakonferensie van Cites se COP17beraad gese leeuboere sal hul teelgeriewe nou by Cites moet registreer as hulle leeubeendere na die Ooste wil uitvoer. Leeubeendere sal net met Citespermitte uitgevoer mag word.

Carla van der Vyver, uitvoerende hoof van die SuidAfrikaanse Roofdiertelersvereniging, het gese die leeubedryf is “baie verlig en bly” dat hulle nie gesluit gaan word nie en dat hulle met hul sake kan voortgaan.

Ian Michler van Invent Africa, wat hom sedert 1997 daarvoor beywer dat die bedryf gesluit moet word, het gese dit is skokkend dat Cites SuidAfrika toelaat om met leeus en ander wild te teel.

Dit is veral “onbegryplik” dat Cites Saterdag besluit het genie we waar tiers in China geteel word, moet gesluit word.

Die Environmental Investigating Agency (EIA) het op die beraad gese navorsing wat hulle gedoen het, het gewys dat die teel van tiers in aanhouding en die verhandeling van hul beendere, tande en pote stropery van wilde tiers laat toeneem het.

Volgens Molewa het “wetenskaplike navorsing” in SuidAfrika gewys die teel en verhandeling van leeus se beendere, tande en pote is ‘n “bewaringsinstrument” vir die land se sowat 4 000 wilde leeus.

Sy meen dat die tussen 6 000 en 8 000 halfmak leeus in die vraag na die dier se skelet in die Ooste kan voorsien.

Molewa het voorts gese haar departement en die departement van landbou, bosbou en visserye wat tans die bedryf “reguleer”, is besig om gesamentlik wetgewing op te stel wat ten doel het om na die welsyn van die geblikte leeus om te sien.

Die welsynsaspekte wat betref die wyse waarop leeus geteel, in hokke aangehou en doodgemaak word, is egter vir haar ‘n bron van kommer.

Sy meen steeds dat die diere as trofee gejag mag word, maar dat streng regulasies moet geld.

Volgens haar doen elke provinsie nou “net wat hy wil” wanneer leeujagtogte onderneem word. Die departement van omgewingsake bepaal dat ‘n halfmak leeu net in ‘n plek van 1 000 ha vrygelaat moet word voordat hy gejag mag word. Die dier mag ook nie van ‘n bakkie gejag word, met aas gelok word of bedwelmd wees nie.

Die departement onderhandel nou met die departement van landbou, bosbou en visserye dat leeus wat in aanhouding geteel is, tyd gegun word om “weer wild te raak” sodat hulle ‘n regverdige wegkomkans het wanneer hulle gejag word. Sodanige tydperk kan enigiets van een tot twee jaar wees. “Die tydperk sal met ons susterdepartement onderhandel word,” het sy gese.

Van der Vyver het gese ‘n leeuskelet (met die kop aan) is sowat R25 000 werd.

Michler, een van die vervaardigers van die opspraakwekkende dokumentere rolprent Blood Lions, het gese hul veldtog teen die onetiese bedryf gaan verskerp word.

Dele van geblikte leeus mag uitgevoer word

Die koning van die oerwoud is eergisteraand op die COP17beraad in Sandton tot ‘n “sak waardelose bene” gereduseer.

So het die nieregeringsorganisasie Blood Lions Official getwiet oor die konvensie oor die internasionale handel in bedreigde spesies (Cites) se besluit dat die liggaamsdele van SuidAfrika se geblikte leeus uitgevoer mag word.

Cites het wel bepaal dat die beendere, tande en pote van wilde leeus wat aan natuurlike oorsake dood is, nie na Asie uitgevoer mag word nie. Maar hy is nie gekant daarteen dat die liggaamsdele van die sowat 8 000 geblikte leeus wat in klein kampies in SuidAfrika geteel word, gebruik word nie.

Dit was ondanks die Wereldbewaringsunie (IUCN) se beroep op SuidAfrika om die geblikteleeubedryf te staak.

Edna Molewa, minister van omgewingsake, het die IUCN se beraad bygewoon wat in September in Hawaii gehou is.

Karen Trendler van Four Paws se Cites se besluit is ‘n tragedie.

“Dit is ‘n ontnugterende besef dat Cites ‘n handelsorganisasie is en dit (COP17) ‘n spel is wat om politieke getalle wentel.”

People Against Canned Hunting (Pach) het getwiet: “Dankie, Cites. Panthera leo sal teen 2030 uitsterf.”

Leeus word intensief op nagenoeg 200 SuidAfrikaanse phase, veral in die Vrystaat, Noordwes en Limpopo, geteel.

Molewa se dit is nie onwettig om wild in SuidAfrika te teel nie. Sy beskou dit as “volhoubare benutting”. Sy se die welsyn van die leeus in gevangenskap bekommer haar tog en haar departement ondersoek dit.

The captive lion industry: A sustainability scam?

Cape Town – The notion of ‘sustainability’ has become the most overused and consequently meaningless phrase within conservation and wildlife circles. Used in equal measure by those that manage responsibly and the abusers of wildlife, it’s hardly surprising then that the predator breeding and canned or captive lion hunting industry is also invoking the term as a way of trying to sanitize what they do.

But how sustainable will it all be when the ‘wildness’ and the thrill has gone?

Contrary to the promotional claims, much of what takes place behind the fences of South Africa’s predator farms adds up to an industry that cannot be sustainable. Those involved won’t see it, and neither will they listen to words of warning because of the lucrative returns they currently make. And government, a rather odd bed-fellow to this constituency, seem to have been seduced by flimsy short-term economic arguments.

The breeding, trading, petting, walking, viewing, filming, de-boning and killing frenzy currently underway, mostly in South Africa but also in other countries across southern African, is about making as much money out of these animals as they possibly can and doing this in the shortest possible time frame. Of course, not every operator has the same parameters, but in my experience, the vast majority have never had any other consideration.

In doing so, the only measures they use are human selected ones: pretty much every aspect of the ecological or natural world has been removed with the animals being bred and kept under intensive agricultural-type conditions. In other words, lions and other predators on these farms have already been tamed and are now well on their way to becoming domesticated.

However, such is the greed and short-sightedness, those involved seem not to care that this process provides the ultimate paradox, a situation that pulls the rug from under their very own feet – not to mention what it means for the vast majority of us opposed to these practices, or for future generations.

This entire industry is based on selling the notion that whatever it is buyers will be doing to or with the lions, the supplied creature will be a wild one. Reinforcing the ‘wildness’ of these animals and the thrill that comes with the interaction or use is the central tenet for the marketers as without this, what would the experience be? It’s cunning, and often comes with fabrications of danger to enhance the yarn. However, after a few generations of intensive breeding, they are already producing tame and docile animals, the first step to complete domestication. And we know there is no market in petting house cats and dogs or shooting domestic cattle and sheep.

So, what happens then when the ‘wildness’ and the thrill is gone? Will canned hunters or petting visitor’s part with their money without these attributes? Much like a pyramid scheme, the ‘wild’ and ‘thrill’ capital is fast running out and soon they will be left selling hype and a lie.

And while on scams, the volunteer programmes that feed revenue and free labour into many of these lion farms is something Government should also be looking into. They entice people, often young students who believe they are making a worthy conservation contribution, into paying substantial amounts of money to offer their services to these facilities. For the most part, it’s misleading marketing and it has to be putting hundreds if not thousands of locals out of work. Also cunning, but how does one justify this under ‘sustainable use’?

The domestication process is the most shocking and damning aspect to this industry, and it will be the shameful legacy of those involved, which includes the decision-makers who have failed to act. Imagine being involved in domesticating lions, Africa’s most iconic species and then trying to justify your actions as conservation? Or for that matter, claiming it as ‘sustainable use’, a principle that obligates us to responsibility and caution when managing wilderness and wildlife.

Shocking as it may seem, there is still the occasional defender, one of them being the North-West University in Pochefstroom where a tourism professor from the institution recently claimed that lion breeding programmes are needed for conservation, and to ensure ‘sustainable’ tourism and economic growth in the country, as if we have no other means of doing this. One can only wonder how approximately 800 canned or captive hunters out of the over 9million annual visitors, and making a contribution comprising a fraction of less than 1% to overall annual tourism revenues reaching close to R100billion are achieving this? And has this institution accounted for the damage that this type of unethical hunting is doing to the country’s reputation as a responsible destination?

These ludicrous claims put the university completely at odds with every other interested party who have called for an end to these practices. Most recently, at the IUCN World Conservation Congress held in Hawaii, Motion 009 calling on the South African Government to “terminate the hunting and breeding of captive lions and other predators” was unanimously approved.

Prior to this we have had the majority of South Africa’s professional hunting community vote against these practices principally because they lack any form of ethical sustainability; almost the entire responsible tourism sector has pledged not to support these industries; the Minister of Tourism in South Africa has called for “stronger measures to control if not ban the breeding of lions in captivity because we don’t need it in terms of our conservation efforts”; in addition, the Minister has stated that our true conservation record and Brand South Africa is being damaged; three governments, Australia, France and Netherlands have banned the importation of lion trophies, and the US Fish & Wildlife Dept. give every indication they do not regard captive lions as part of conservation; and most tellingly, almost every recognized conservation agency and lion scientist has come out against these industries.

Farming lions to be petted, traded or killed cannot under any reasonable definition be equated to or classified as conservation, and neither should those involved be able to justify their actions under the banner of sustainable use. And to accept either of the above would be to defraud our conservation and tourism record as well as all those who are currently doing such vital conservation work.